Tracy McGaugh at Feminist Law Professors points us to an excellent article analyzing threatening, violent, and/or murderous behavior by students. The article is co-written by three scholars from different disciplines: Helen Smith, a forensic psychologist, Sandra Thomas, a nursing professor, and Carol Parker, a law professor. The title of the article is “Anger and Violence on Campus: Recommendations for Legal Educators,” but their analysis and recommendations seem to me to apply to all college and university faculty and programs, and perhaps to high school faculty as well. Read it, and consider passing it along to your department Chair or college Dean.
Historiann passes this along to you, gentle reader, because she’s been feeling more than a little vulnerable since the dreadful events at Virginia Tech last year. My university is the V-Tech of Colorado, and Colorado is a state where almost anyone can obtain a permit to carry a concealed handgun. And when the state legistlature passed the concealed-carry law in 2003, it specifically excluded college campuses from the list of places one could not bring in a concealed weapon–K-12 schools, and quite conveniently, the Colorado State Capitol building are all on that list, but in universities we’re expected to shift for ourselves. (In fact, the Capitol building just recently and permanently re-installed metal detectors because a disturbed man with a gun entered and threatened the Governor’s life before being gunned down himself last July 16.)
The only place where I take issue with Smith, Thomas, and Parker is in their conclusion, where they lay the blame on “aggressive role models in television, movies, videogames, and other popular media.” They cite a persuasive recent longitudinal study, so I see that exposure to violent media is certainly one factor, but where is the discussion of gender and violence? All school and university killers in the past several years have one thing in common: they were all boys or men who had access to guns. Most (but not all) tend to be younger rather than older, and the overwhelming majority of them have been white. “Anger and Violence on Campus” cites a few examples of women law students who displayed inappropriate behavior to law professors, but it was only verbal aggression cited in the cases involving women students. So, aggression and violence on campus is overwhelmingly a problem with angry young men who feel entitled to use guns against people they perceive to have wronged them. Historiann herself has written about the highly gendered aspects of gun ownership in colonial America, so I am amazed that the connection between American masculinity and guns today hasn’t receieved more attention. (Is the connection between men and guns so naturalized that we don’t question it? Why doesn’t this alarm us more?)
The bottom line in this paper is that faculty members are largely on their own when it comes to dealing with crazed students. Start packing heat, if that’s your style–and if you live in a concealed-carry permit state, then it’s all nice ‘n legal. (Just be sure to disarm before you go pick up little Emma and Cody at school.) If administrators at your school don’t take advice from Smith
and Wesson, Thomas, and Parker, this article will at least arm you with a little more knowledge about identifying disturbed students. Have you had any experience with dangerous and/or armed students? How did you deal with them, and how did your university respond? Do you think that professors in feminist studies might be more vulnerable to threats and violence from students because our perspectives may especially threaten disturbed young men?
UPDATE: As Knitting Clio points out in the comments below, sadly there was a fatal shooting with a female perp at Louisiana Technical College in Baton Rouge yesterday morning, which I learned about after publishing this post. However, I don’t think that one female perp is a meaningful trend when every other example of fatal violence at schools (junior high through universities) has featured male shooters, especially given the longue duree of the connection between guns and masculinity in this country. How awful for the faculty and students at Louisiana Tech–yet another school whose sense of safety and fellowship in academic pursuit is shattered.
I must admit that I, too, wonder about this from time to time. I’ve never had a student seem overtly violent, but I have had the withdrawn type who seems resentful of any expectation of attendance, work, etc. I always wonder, when I deal with male students of this ilk, whether there could be some latent violence there.
And yes, I too am amazed that this conversation never includes the dimension of gender.
LikeLike
Pingback: Another Campus Shooting « Knitting Clio
I agree, Historiann; it’s clear that the vast majority (almost all) of the shootings and violence are perpetrated by boys and young men, even if some girls are becoming violent. While I do think that there is generally very little discussion of the connection to gender/masculinity in the popular media, this is not necessarily so in the academic discourse. Every time there is a school shooting, its gendered dimensions get discussed by a variety of academics on the Women’s Studies Listserv (WMST-L; http://userpages.umbc.edu/~korenman/wmst/wmst-l_index.html). Sociologist Michael Kimmel, whose work I sometimes find a little too sympathetic of mens’ trials and tribulations, has published a number of articles on this issue and has even had some success in having the mainstream media address the gendered aspects of school shootings.
LikeLike
Though it’s not a school shooting, I’ve covered the shootings in Kirkwood, Mo., during the past four days. After watching a local St. Louis television station’s interview of City Attorney John Hessel, I couldn’t help but think how he and other victims of Thursday night’s shooting tragedy might have fared better with the help of concealed firearms.
Among the 30 or so gathered in the Kirkwood City Hall meeting room that night, only one trained and qualified person — Officer Tom Ballman — carried a firearm. Had only one other trained person carried a firearm into the meeting that night, the number of dead and wounded might have been greatly reduced. Surprisingly, Kirkwood city laws don’t entirely prevent it!
Read more about it here.
LikeLike
Pingback: John Bohstedt: British historian, tough guy : Historiann : History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present
Pingback: Guns, threats, space, and gender : Historiann : History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present
Pingback: Gun bans: what are we really talking about here? : Historiann : History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present
Pingback: Murder in UA-Huntsville faculty meeting : Historiann : History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present
Pingback: Late April watching and waiting : Historiann : History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present
Pingback: A Modest Proposal : Historiann : History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present
I am not sure where you’re getting your info, but good topic.
I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more.
Thanks for wonderful info I was looking for this information for my mission.
LikeLike
Pingback: Wrung out. | Historiann